Disclaimer. This page summarizes the regulatory landscape as it pertains to brand and marketing claims. It is not legal advice. Statutes, rules, and certification standards change. All claims with regulatory implications must be reviewed by qualified counsel and the relevant agency before publication.

The stance

Three sentences. Memorize them.

  1. 01

    Marketing matches the filing.

    If the website says it, the file at the agency must support it.

  2. 02

    No claim without a record.

    Every measurable claim has a document behind it. If the document doesn't exist, neither does the claim.

  3. 03

    Default to disclosure.

    When in doubt, say more, not less. Transparency is the cheapest insurance we have.

Regulatory landscape

Federal

Agency / FrameworkWhat it governsBrand impact
FDA — Seafood HACCP (21 CFR 123)Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points for seafood processorsCompliance is a baseline claim; detailed claims require auditable plan
FDA — Food Labeling (21 CFR 101)Required label elements for packaged seafoodDrives our retail label spec when DTC launches
FDA — Seafood ListAcceptable market names by speciesOur market name is "redfish" or "Redfish"; Sciaenops ocellatus as the species name
NOAA / NMFS — COOLCountry-of-origin labelingOur claim: "Product of USA — Texas" with documentation
FTC — Green Guides (16 CFR 260)Truth-in-advertising for environmental claimsDrives our sustainability-claim hygiene rules

State (Texas)

AgencyWhat it governsBrand impact
Texas Parks & Wildlife (TPWD)Aquaculture & fish farming permitsWe operate under TPWD permit(s); referenced in transparency reporting
Texas Department of Agriculture (TDA)Aquaculture co-regulation; certain marketing programsConfirm any "Texas product" branding programs (e.g. GO TEXAN)
Texas DSHS — Food SafetyFood handling for processed productSanitation & HACCP plans align here
TCEQWater discharge, effluentDischarge data & constructed-wetland claims must reference TCEQ permits

Sustainability claim hygiene

What we say. What we never say.

Say (when documented)

  • "Recirculating systems reusing X% of process water" (with X documented)
  • "Feed conversion ratio of X.X averaged across [period]"
  • "Discharge polished through a constructed wetland"
  • "Native species — Sciaenops ocellatus — endemic to Texas coastal waters"
  • "BAP-certified at the [level] facility" (only when current)
  • "Rated [Best Choice / Good Alternative] by Seafood Watch"

Never say

  • Sustainable alone, with no supporting claim
  • All-natural — no FDA definition for fish
  • Organic — USDA does not certify organic finfish
  • Wild-caught — we farm
  • Eco-friendly / Green / Earth-conscious — vague per FTC
  • Carbon neutral — only with verified third-party assessment
  • Locally sourced — without a stated radius

Decision tree

What to do when you see a claim you're not sure about

Is the claim measurable?
  ├── No  → Rewrite or remove
  └── Yes → Is there a document supporting it?
        ├── No  → Pull until documented
        └── Yes → Is the document current?
              ├── No  → Pull until refreshed
              └── Yes → Is the claim consistent with our filings?
                    ├── No  → Stop. Escalate to brand steward + counsel.
                    └── Yes → Publish.

When uncertain at any step, escalate. The cost of pulling a draft before publication is roughly zero. The cost of pulling it after — across PR, customer trust, and possibly regulatory action — is not.

Calendar

Brand-touching compliance items

ItemCadenceOwner
Permit renewals (TPWD, TCEQ)Per permit termOperations
HACCP plan reviewAnnualOperations + counsel
Marketing claims audit (vs. live copy)QuarterlyBrand steward + counsel
Sustainability data report (public)AnnualOperations + brand
Certification audits (BAP / ASC)Per certification cycleOperations
Partner co-marketing reviewPer requestBrand steward

Full federal/state landscape, recordkeeping cadence, and live regulatory pointers in brand/10-regulatory-compliance.md.